Bundeskartellamt leitet Verfahren gegen Audible / Amazon und Apple ein

By -
Link zur Mitteilung des Bundeskartellamts


Meldung vom:16.11.2015

Das Bundeskartellamt hat ein Verwaltungsverfahren gegen die Amazon-Tochtergesellschaft Audible.com und gegen die Apple Computer Inc. eingeleitet. Die Unternehmen unterhalten eine langjährige Vereinbarung über den Bezug von Hörbüchern durch Apple bei Audible für den Vertrieb über Apples Download-Shop ITunes-Store.

Andreas Mundt, Präsident des Bundeskartellamtes: „Die beiden Unternehmen haben bei dem digitalen Angebot von Hörbüchern in Deutschland eine starke Position. Daher sehen wir uns veranlasst, die Vereinbarung zwischen diesen beiden Wettbewerbern im Hörbuchbereich genauer zu prüfen. Es muss sichergestellt sein, dass den Hörbuchverlagen für den Absatz ihrer digitalen Hörbücher hinreichende Ausweichalternativen zur Verfügung stehen. Die Verfahrenseinleitung erfolgt auf die Beschwerde des Börsenvereins des Deutschen Buchhandels, die sich gegen verschiedene Verhaltensweisen von Audible wendet, unter anderem die exklusive Belieferung des ITunes-Store von Apple. Das Bundeskartellamt steht im engen Kontakt mit der Europäischen Kommission, der diese Beschwerde ebenfalls vorliegt.“

Audible ist ein führender Anbieter von Hörbüchern in Deutschland mit Schwerpunkt bei Hörbuch-Downloads, die sowohl über Audible.de als auch über die Amazon-Handelsplattform abrufbar sind. Darüber hinaus zählt Audible zu den größten Produzenten von Hörbüchern in Deutschland und Europa. Apple betreibt mit dem ITunes-Store eine der größten digitalen Medien-Handelsplattformen, die neben Musik, Videos und Apps auch eBooks und Hörbücher für den Download anbietet.


Popular posts from this blog

CJEU on Spiegel Online: The use of a protected work for the purposes of reporting current events does not, in principle, require a prior request for authorisation

By -
Source: Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-516/17

Spiegel Online
deenfr

Freedom of establishment

The use of a protected work for the purposes of reporting current events does not, in principle, require a prior request for authorisation

Court of Justice of the European Union

PRESS RELEASE No 101/19
Luxembourg, 29 July 2019

Judgment in Case C-516/17
Spiegel Online v Volker Beck

The use of a protected work for the purposes of reporting current events does not, in principle, require a prior request for authorisation

Furthermore, a work may be quoted by means of a hyperlink, provided that that quoted work, in its specific form, was previously made available to the public with the copyright holder’s authorisation or in accordance with a non-contractual licence or statutory authorisation

Volker Beck, a former member of the Bundestag (Federal Parliament, Germany) is the author of a manuscript on criminal policy relating to sexual offences committed against minors, which was published under a pseu…
Read more

EU auditors scrutinize EU Commission's annual 24.5m € support to NBC affiliate Euronews

By -
Source: ECA - eca.europa.eu

EU support helps Euronews to broaden its coverage of European affairs, but funding needs to be better monitored, say EU Auditors.


The EU’s support of an average of €24.5 million a year has helped Euronews to develop a unique business model and broadcast programmes on EU affairs in a number of languages, according to a new rapid case review by the European Court of Auditors. However, most citizens in the EU are unable to access it, as the channel is not a public service broadcaster in any Member State. Moreover, the auditors identified shortcomings in the way the European Commission monitors the performance of Euronews against agreed objectives and commitments made. Euronews was created in 1993 by ten European public broadcasters to reinforce European identity and integration, and the EU has provided it with financial support since then. In recent years, it has changed its ownership structure by acquiring private investors. The auditors analysed the funding of …
Read more

EU Court to rule about search engine de-referencing - Google v CNIL (France)

By -
Image
Source: www.curia.europa.eu
 Court of Justice of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 2/19
Luxembourg, 10 January 2019
Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-507/17
Google v CNIL (France)
Advocate General Szpunar proposes that the Court should limit the scope of the de-referencing that search engine operators are required to carry out to the EU
By decision of 21 May 2015, the President of the French Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties; ‘the CNIL’) served formal notice on Google that, when acceding to a request from a natural person for the removal of links to web pages from the list of results displayed following a search performed on the basis of that person’s name, it must apply that removal to all of its search engine’s domain name extensions.
Google refused to comply with that formal notice, merely removing the links in question from only the results displayed following a search performed on the domain nam…
Read more